Sunday, September 6, 2026
- Advertisement -

Political appointments… what should the public know?

OBA wants transparency on Minister-appointed roles; Government says law allows for political appointments; We take a look at the remuneration for some of those jobs…

Should Government be transparent with who they put in Government roles โ€“ particularly when such appointments are at the discretion of the Minister?

The OBA’s Jarion Richardson certainly thinks so, suggesting they are open to politicisation.

However, Government has affirmed that the law allows for a number of political appointments.

Our Gary Foster Skelton took a look at some of these roles and found out โ€“ the money can be pretty goodโ€ฆ

WATCH the report above. (SCROLL down for Jarion Richardson’s comments and the Government’s response)


Bermuda Government Salaries as of January 2026:

Selected salaries (Special and Ministerial Advisors and Aides, and Political roles):

Special Advisor, Cabinet Office – $145,035
Special Advisor, Ministry of Economy & Labour – $105,510
Special Advisor, Ministry of Housing – $109,414
Special Advisor, Ministry of Youth, Social… – $105,510
Special Advisor, Ministry of Home Affairs – $119,615

Administrative Assistant (Political), Cabinet Office – $106,699
Political Aide #1, Ministry of Finance – $87,148
Political Aide #2, Ministry of Finance – $89,454
Political Advisor, Ministry of Home Affairs – $105,510
Political Aide/Consultant, Ministry of Justice – $151,511

Special Aide to the Minister, Ministry of Housing – $101,739
Special Aide to the Minister, Ministry of Tourism… – $101,739
Ministerial Aide, Ministry of National Security – $121,170
Minister’s Aide – PW #1, Ministry of Public Works – $66,811
Minister’s Aide – PW #2, Ministry of Public Works – $105,510
Aide to the Premier, Cabinet Office – $105,510
Aide to the Opposition Leader, Legislature – $43,769


Statement from Jarion Richardson, Shadow Minister of Cabinet Office & Digital Innovation (April 12 2026):

The One Bermuda Alliance expresses deep frustration and disappointment at what appears to be yet another example of the Progressive Labour Party rewarding its own candidates and affiliates with roles connected to the machinery of government.

The recent communication issued in relation to the Election Day Experience Survey, bearing the name of a former PLP candidate who has since been engaged in a consultancy role connected to government functions, raises serious and legitimate concerns about the continued blurring of lines between party and state.

This pattern of manipulating the peopleโ€™s property for political gain has been seen time and again.

This concern is heightened by the fact that the individual in question is not a politically detached professional, but a deeply embedded figure within the Progressive Labour Party.

He has served as Chairman of the PLPโ€™s youth wing, Progressive Minds, has publicly advocated on behalf of the Partyโ€™s policy agenda, and stood as an official PLP candidate in the last General Election. He is, by any reasonable standard, a political actor within the governing partyโ€™s structure. When individuals with that level of political involvement are then engaged in roles connected to government functions, it raises serious and unavoidable questions about whether such appointments are being made on the basis of independence and merit, or political affiliation.

Bermudians are increasingly concerned that under this Government, access to public roles and opportunities is too often determined not by merit, independence, or transparency, but by political alignment. That perceptionโ€”whether denied or dismissed by the Governmentโ€”is corrosive. It undermines confidence in public institutions and reinforces the growing belief that political loyalty is being rewarded at the expense of fairness.

Good governance demands more.

It requires that public appointments, formal or informal, are made through transparent, accountable processes that inspire confidence across the entire community, not just within one political party. It requires a clear and visible separation between those who seek elected office and those entrusted with administering public functions.

When that line is repeatedly crossed, it should concern every Bermudian, regardless of political affiliation.

The One Bermuda Alliance has consistently advocated for higher standards in public life. Our platform and principles are grounded in integrity, accountability, and the proper stewardship of public resources. We believe that government must serve the country, not the party.

This latest development only reinforces why so many Bermudians feel disillusioned with politics. Trust is not lost in a single moment, it is eroded through repeated actions that suggest the system is not operating on a level playing field.

We therefore call on the Government to:

  • Clarify the process by which such appointments are made
  • Disclose the scope, terms, and remuneration of consultancy roles connected to public functions; and
  • Commit to clear, published standards that prevent the politicisation of government work.

Bermuda deserves a system that is fair, transparent, and worthy of public trust.

The One Bermuda Alliance will continue to hold the Government to account and advocate for a higher standard of governance on behalf of all Bermudians.

Response from the Government, 14 April 2026:

โ€œThe Government rejects the Oppositionโ€™s latest attempt to create confusion about a well-established process.

โ€œUnder the laws of Bermuda and the Ministerial Code of Conduct, Ministers are allowed, with the written approval of the Premier, to appoint advisers or consultants to assist them in their work.

โ€œThe law is also clear that these appointments may be political or expert in nature. There is nothing improper, unusual, or new about that.

โ€œIn this case, the appropriate process was followed and the necessary approval was given.

โ€œWhat makes the Oppositionโ€™s criticism even more perplexing is that the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Digital Innovation is working to deliver on an election promise to modernise Bermudaโ€™s electoral system, including the introduction of absentee voting, a reform the Opposition itself has long said it supports.

โ€œIf the Opposition supports absentee voting and electoral reform, why is it complaining about the work being done to advance it?

โ€œFor clarity, the appointment was appropriately made. And the work being carried out is aimed at delivering a reform that has broad public support.

โ€œGovernment is in fact doing the work required to deliver on its pledged promises.โ€

Author

- Advertisement -

Latest News

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -